Quote:
Originally Posted by bradical
While I see UD as more of a Oligopoly than a Monopoly,
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jr24ai3
Upper Deck is not a monopoly:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonedef2oo8
Its not a monopoly but dont let a little thing like facts get in the way of a tale.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kajshack
He may be a troll, but he's right. Way too many people babbling about stuff they know nothing about.
|
Did any of you actually read about the lawsuit?
From Beckett:
a select few licenses (NCAA, MLS) and a roster of exclusive athletes whose autographs can only be found in Upper Deck products such as Tiger Woods, Michael Jordan, LeBron James and Landon Donovan.
and:
Specifically, Frontline contends that Upper Deck is in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act and Section 3 of the Clayton Act with its policy.
Part 2 of the Sherman act says: Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize
any part of the trade or commerce ...