Thread: BO sues UD
View Single Post
Old 07-22-2011, 04:45 PM   #88 (permalink)
Nicnac's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: nutty Florida
Posts: 11,745

Originally Posted by bradical View Post
While I see UD as more of a Oligopoly than a Monopoly,
Originally Posted by jr24ai3 View Post
Upper Deck is not a monopoly:
Originally Posted by tonedef2oo8 View Post
Its not a monopoly but dont let a little thing like facts get in the way of a tale.
Originally Posted by kajshack View Post
He may be a troll, but he's right. Way too many people babbling about stuff they know nothing about.
Did any of you actually read about the lawsuit?

From Beckett:
a select few licenses (NCAA, MLS) and a roster of exclusive athletes whose autographs can only be found in Upper Deck products such as Tiger Woods, Michael Jordan, LeBron James and Landon Donovan.

Specifically, Frontline contends that Upper Deck is in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act and Section 3 of the Clayton Act with its policy.

Part 2 of the Sherman act says: Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce ...
Nicnac is online now   Reply With Quote