View Single Post
Old 09-10-2012, 11:13 AM   #357 (permalink)
uberfatty
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,528
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KaraandMelliesDaddy View Post
For my purposes, 55 & 81 were more valuable than 14.
makes sense - I maybe was just mis-reading what you meant by "lower picks" being traded for Top 30.
uberfatty is offline   Reply With Quote