Originally Posted by bd3d86
So, they can use the MLB Logos in the pictures because they won the rights to those pictures (from the old set)? I'm sure I have something wrong in that, but can someone clarify?
Only the buybacks have logos. Obviously since the cards are already produced they can sell it. It would just be like if I got Ripken to sign on a 90 leaf card and then sold it on ebay. Nothing wrong with that. Now if you look at the new cards that they made, while the players are wearing their pro uniforms the logos have been photoshopped out. That is how they can get around the license (so no they did not win the rights to photos with mlb unis)