View Single Post
Old 12-11-2012, 07:17 PM   #16 (permalink)
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 15,223

Originally Posted by jeg2315 View Post
There mere fact that Apple has engrained people with their marketing is enough - they "earn" vastly disproportionate revenue compared to their market share.

Apple's campaign, in a sense, is akin to how cigarettes still have so much staying power given the long-term, industry-wide PR spin: it's taken away from hard "evidence" to quantify and compare their alleged characteristics to PCs, so what's left to influence that?
Or maybe its because they put out a far superior quality product compared to the competition?

comparing it to cigarettes / addiction is not the same thing.

Why dont you compare to something like

Buying 2 cars that can get you from point a to b but costing different?

Or buying Topps to Topps chrome? WHy pay more for Chrome ?
Orangejello727 is offline   Reply With Quote