Originally Posted by jbmets95
I think its crazy that some1 should lose
a 2nd round pick 3rd round pick AND 4th round pick
just to keep a 2nd 1st round pick
lets not forget, to get the additional top player other top players were given up as well...
im confused cause i thot we agreed and like u said in that post that ppl agreed to that keeping 2 first round players would result in losing rounds 1-3
Originally Posted by mikeman7322
How do you see 2 firsts as equal to a first and second?
per the espn post "2nd round pick --> Kept as a 2nd round pick "
You lose a 3rd by keeping an extra first round pick, which you dont from keeping a second.
And thank you for clarifying my question JB. Makes that a tougher choice to trade future picks
Okay no problem. I think I am confusing myself by looking too deeply into it. If this is what everybody wants to keep it as then sure thing.