View Single Post
Old 10-17-2013, 03:21 PM   #423 (permalink)
stripedbass91
Member
 
stripedbass91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 6,553
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Miracle View Post
I vote no to the three year rule, AND no to the rule you proposed. Keeper Leagues are all about drafting for future potential. If someone grabs a rookie with a late round pick, they should be able to reap the benefits of their good choice for years to come.
I agree with this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by usafshelland View Post
I 1/2 agree with what you state. The other problem with keeper leagues is if a team is outright dominating year in/year out, why would anyone come back and spend more of their money. 1) leaves no incentive to stay in the league, and 2) leaves no incentive for new people to join the league. Sure, it's great for the guy who wins year in/year out.
I agree if a team is outright dominating then it may discourage other from coming back but that is why we have reversals in the draft order (last place gets 1st pick next season...first place gets last pick next season). Allowing teams to build for the future (hopefully more than three years) would be hampered by having a rule like that.
__________________
http://photobucket.com/stripedbass91cards
J! E! T! S! JETS! JETS! JETS!
PC- Memorabilia
stripedbass91 is offline   Reply With Quote