Group break non-payers: neg, neut or nothin?

oldgoldy97 · 03-22-2012, 03:16 PM

What is the consensus on how to handle non-payers in group breaks? I did leave a negative i-trader for one person, but he was in it for good chunk of change. For relatively small amounts of money, do you think a neutral feedback is good enough? It's one thing if a person hasn't been on here in a while, but sometimes people are on the same day you are pming them and there is no response.

Andrew Jones · 03-22-2012, 03:28 PM

I understand leaving a negative, but IMO a neutral is the way to go. I really think there needs to be some sort of consequence for committing to a group break and then backing out and I think other group break hosts deserve a warning when someone has done that before (i.e. iTrader feedback). I know houdini and I disagreed on this issue though.

cking · 03-22-2012, 04:40 PM

If they did not pay,then they did not pay. You should not base your decision to leave feedback based on the amount of money. A non payer is a non payer, period.

gunshowboy · 03-22-2012, 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cking

If they did not pay,then they did not pay. You should not base your decision to leave feedback based on the amount of money. A non payer is a non payer, period.

"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities"

jlzinck · 03-22-2012, 08:10 PM

Neutral at best and I would never let them in another break

Tyler · 03-23-2012, 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jlzinck

Neutral at best and I would never let them in another break

These are the rules I follow.

revil41 · 03-23-2012, 02:43 AM

Yeah i have been in a couple of breaks where people do not pay, and at the last second pull out, leaves everybody scrambling to cover the open slots. We should have a separate box break feedback for both Host and Breakers, easier for the Admins to oversee so we don't have any problems in the near future.

And to answer the question i agree a neutral should be left.

mmbtvs · 03-23-2012, 08:04 AM

Blacklist them so they can never sign up for your breaks again and then neutral.

ronlabo · 03-23-2012, 08:19 AM

It's a negative, they didn't follow thru on a committment how is that a nuetral???...NEG the sh!t out of them all

NonSportsCardForum · 03-23-2012, 09:09 AM

If a neg is warranted for backing out of an agreed trade or sale, this should be treated no different.

oldgoldy97 · 03-23-2012, 12:49 PM

I gave them both neutrals. Interested to see if they cause any flak about it. I didn't give them a negative because, shoot, I didn't give the guy who sent me a card with a pube sticking out of the holder a negative and I found that waaaaay worse.

XL5 · 03-23-2012, 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NonSportsCardForum

If a neg is warranted for backing out of an agreed trade or sale, this should be treated no different.

It's even worse than a regular deal. Backing out of a group break can potentially screw up all the other buyers as well.

palmdesertcards · 03-23-2012, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XL5

It's even worse than a regular deal. Backing out of a group break can potentially screw up all the other buyers as well.

yuck!

03-22-2012, 03:16 PM	#1 (permalink)
oldgoldy97 Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: land of 10,000 letdowns Posts: 7,116	Group break non-payers: neg, neut or nothin? What is the consensus on how to handle non-payers in group breaks? I did leave a negative i-trader for one person, but he was in it for good chunk of change. For relatively small amounts of money, do you think a neutral feedback is good enough? It's one thing if a person hasn't been on here in a while, but sometimes people are on the same day you are pming them and there is no response. __________________ I don't sell or trade and thus live a happier life. Leon Sandcastle: 2013 NFL ROY

03-22-2012, 04:40 PM	#3 (permalink)
cking Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: uranus Posts: 6,928 cking	If they did not pay,then they did not pay. You should not base your decision to leave feedback based on the amount of money. A non payer is a non payer, period. __________________ I ONLY SHIP TO THE USA DONT LIKE MY POSTS?OH WELL FOR YOU I TAKE PRIDE IN MY CUSTOMER SERVICE

03-22-2012, 08:10 PM	#5 (permalink)
jlzinck Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Cape Cod, MA Posts: 11,752 jlzinck	Neutral at best and I would never let them in another break __________________ http://vaughnlive.tv/jlzinck http://www.ustream.tv/channel/jon-s-box-breaks-and-more

03-23-2012, 02:43 AM	#7 (permalink)
revil41 Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: NWPA Posts: 1,517	Yeah i have been in a couple of breaks where people do not pay, and at the last second pull out, leaves everybody scrambling to cover the open slots. We should have a separate box break feedback for both Host and Breakers, easier for the Admins to oversee so we don't have any problems in the near future. And to answer the question i agree a neutral should be left. __________________ 2013 the year integrity went away. Scamming is wrong. But if you get caught and make it right, it cancels the scamming out.

03-23-2012, 08:19 AM	#9 (permalink)
ronlabo Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Long Branch, NJ Posts: 9,884 ronlabo	It's a negative, they didn't follow thru on a committment how is that a nuetral???...NEG the sh!t out of them all __________________ realreodeal plmk when you make that trip to JERSEY

03-22-2012, 03:28 PM	#2 (permalink)
Andrew Jones Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Indianapolis, IN Posts: 4,863 um1998nc	I understand leaving a negative, but IMO a neutral is the way to go. I really think there needs to be some sort of consequence for committing to a group break and then backing out and I think other group break hosts deserve a warning when someone has done that before (i.e. iTrader feedback). I know houdini and I disagreed on this issue though.

03-23-2012, 08:04 AM	#8 (permalink)
mmbtvs Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 7,685	Blacklist them so they can never sign up for your breaks again and then neutral.

03-23-2012, 09:09 AM	#10 (permalink)
NonSportsCardForum Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Austin Tx Posts: 2,428	If a neg is warranted for backing out of an agreed trade or sale, this should be treated no different.

03-23-2012, 12:49 PM	#11 (permalink)
oldgoldy97 Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: land of 10,000 letdowns Posts: 7,116	I gave them both neutrals. Interested to see if they cause any flak about it. I didn't give them a negative because, shoot, I didn't give the guy who sent me a card with a pube sticking out of the holder a negative and I found that waaaaay worse. __________________ I don't sell or trade and thus live a happier life. Leon Sandcastle: 2013 NFL ROY

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode